Can the strategy be right while the next move is wrong?

In 2011, Netflix was managing two different ways of delivering the same evening's entertainment. One moved physical discs through the mail. The other delivered video over the internet. The company's annual filing described a business evolving toward streaming while still serving DVD subscribers. Those operations involved different costs, assets, and suppliers. Seeing the difference was strategically reasonable. The unresolved question was how much of that internal distinction customers should have to experience when they simply wanted to watch something.

The transition became visible in stages. Netflix's 2011 annual report records the separation of its combined subscription into distinct streaming and DVD plans. In September, chief executive Reed Hastings announced another change: the DVD business would use the Qwikster name and a separate website. Contemporary reporting reproduced his explanation that the businesses needed greater independence. It also described the practical result for a subscriber using both: separate places to manage queues and account information, rather than one familiar destination.

The proposal came after an unpopular pricing change. That sequence makes a neat causal explanation difficult. Customer anger cannot responsibly be assigned only to a name, a website, a price, or a communication failure. Nevertheless, the proposed workflow change was concrete enough to examine on its own. A customer who previously managed an account in one place would need to navigate two. Organizational clarity for the company was being translated into additional coordination work for the person buying its service.

On October 10, Netflix reversed the Qwikster plan. Contemporary reports quoted Hastings acknowledging that two websites would make the service more difficult for many members. The DVD and streaming offerings would remain accessible through Netflix rather than through the proposed separate brand. The pricing separation remained. This distinction is important: the reversal did not mean the company had abandoned streaming, combined all its operating economics, or restored every aspect of the earlier subscription. It withdrew a particular implementation choice.

That limited reversal is the decision worth studying. Leaders sometimes defend an awkward step because retreat appears to undermine the larger strategy. Here, one can distinguish a destination from the route proposed to reach it. A company might need separate teams, investment decisions, and performance measures without demanding separate identities and administrative work from customers. The possibility does not prove that every shared interface is better. It identifies a design choice that should be tested rather than treated as an inevitable consequence of the strategy.

The stakeholders also valued different kinds of continuity. Customers wanted access and a manageable relationship. Management needed to invest in a changing delivery model. Content suppliers, employees, and investors faced their own economic consequences. Streaming required licensed content and infrastructure; DVD delivery required a physical operation. A single customer account could bridge those differences, but could not erase their costs. The teaching interpretation is therefore about the placement of complexity, not a promise that businesses can transform without tradeoffs or price changes.

Netflix's later prominence can make its transition look predetermined. The 2011 episode is more useful when viewed without that hindsight. Management made a public proposal, encountered resistance, and withdrew part of it while retaining the broader direction. Qwikster was not a functioning new service that customers gradually rejected; the announced split was abandoned before that planned experience became the normal arrangement. For an executive planning a transition, the practical challenge is to identify which decisions preserve future options and which impose avoidable costs on today's customers. Strategic conviction and willingness to revise a specific move can coexist.

For a discussion tailored to your team, explore a workshop with Julien.