Primary care often asks patients to tolerate friction before care begins: long waits, inconvenient locations, rushed encounters, and fragmented communication. Physician founder Tom Lee saw an opportunity to design a different front door.
One Medical, founded in 2007, combined modern offices, easier scheduling, digital communication, and a membership experience. The visible proposition was simple. Primary care could feel more responsive, coherent, and respectful of a patient’s time.
Yet the annual membership fee was never the entire business. Primary care remains a clinical service with salaries, facilities, scheduling, insurance claims, regulatory obligations, and referrals into the broader healthcare system. A better interface could attract members; it could not independently finance the care underneath it.
A consumer experience with institutional supports
One Medical developed several connected revenue and distribution channels. Consumers could enroll directly. Employers could sponsor membership as a benefit. Clinical services could be billed through insurance. The company also formed partnerships with health systems, coordinating affiliated primary-care practices with hospitals and specialists in local markets.
Those pieces reinforced one another. Employers helped aggregate demand. Membership supported the service layer patients could see. Insurance paid for clinical encounters. Health-system relationships supported coordinated referrals and local expansion. Density mattered because convenient primary care requires clinicians, offices, and network connections in the places members live and work.
The company’s public filing made the dependency explicit. Growth depended on retaining employer clients and maintaining health-network partnerships. The model also depended on attracting clinicians and managing the capacity of panels while continuing to deliver the access that made membership appealing.
This is why One Medical is more instructive than a story about attractive offices and a good application. The experience was strategic, but it rested on a complex operating model. Each additional promise imported costs and dependencies. Same-day access affects staffing. Convenient locations affect rent and density. Digital availability affects clinical workflow. Coordination affects relationships with the rest of the system.
The later company expanded into Medicare-focused care through its acquisition of Iora Health and was acquired by Amazon in 2023. Those developments changed the scope and ownership of the model; they do not, by themselves, prove whether the original configuration would work everywhere.
One Medical showed that service design can differentiate healthcare. It also showed why the delightful layer cannot be evaluated alone. The front door matters because it shapes trust and use. But it succeeds only if the operating and payment architecture behind it can continue to honor the promise.
Sources and further reading
Keep exploring
Babylon Health: Growth could not outrun the care model.Cityblock Health: What if the missing infrastructure is trust?Put the question to work with an AI prompt →Browse all cases →For a discussion tailored to your team, explore a workshop with Julien.